Club Log OQRS Survey Results

For the past few months I have been running a survey about Online QSL Requests (OQRS). The objective of this survey has been to understand the preferences and mood of the DX Community. The important question is about bureau cards that can be ordered free of charge from Club Log when OQRS is used.

The survey asked whether charging should be allowed, and whether it should remain mandatory to offer bureau cards. I also asked for suggestions about amounts that would be acceptable if charging were permitted, and invited any other comments.

You can see the survey questions here. All of the information below is in the public domain, and any publication wishing to use the data is welcome to reproduce this information.

Main results

There were 478 responses, which is a good amount of data. Over 90% of respondents indicated that they had used Club Log OQRS before. However, 84% of the responses were from Europe and North America. For this reason, I will not be analysing per-continent breakdowns for other continents (Asia, Oceania, South America, Africa and Antarctica) as there is not enough data to work with for those territories.

continent

The overall result of the survey is shown in the following graphs.

Should Club Log OQRS allow the possibility of charging for bureau cards?

62% of respondents said no to this question.

allow_charging

Should Club Log OQRS continue to require bureau cards to be offered?

71% of respondents said yes to this question.

require_bureau

Supposing that a user decided to charge for bureau cards, what fee would be reasonable?

prices

Regional differences

As explained, I only received enough responses to do this analysis for Europe and North America, but the differences between these two main areas is quite significant:

Continent Require bureau? Allow charging?
North America 73% 47%
Europe 84% 20%

Other comments

I invited other comments in the survey, and as a result of this I have received an extraordinary level of feedback. The majority of respondents took the time to express their views in more detail. The extra information in this data is invaluable and, while I am still working through it now, I would like to specifically acknowledge and thank those people who provided their views. As indicated on the survey, your feedback will only be used by me and the other volunteers working on Club Log, but you will help us make the right choices when we are developing Club Log.

What will change?

As a result of this survey there will be a few changes, but two things will not change:

  • Club Log will not be dropping the requirement to offer bureau cards
  • Club Log will not allow charging for bureau cards

Note: OQRS is optional! There is no obligation to use it, but if it is enabled then the bureau settings apply.

There is support for these policies, but there are plenty of drawbacks (two notable ones being what to do when a user cannot send bureau cards, and the burden of cost moved to the QSL manager by indiscriminate QSLing). It has also emerged that many DXers are causing congestion in the QSL bureaux by requesting both a direct and a bureau card for their contacts, which is extremely wasteful and unnecessary.

To try and compensate for the drawbacks, there are some changes we will be making in Club Log:

  • If a DXer requests a direct card for a QSO, Club Log will no longer allow that person to also request a bureau card for the same QSO.
  • If a bureau card has already been requested, and a DXer then requests a direct card, the direct card request will replace the bureau card request. This reduces the chance that both a direct card and a bureau card will be sent for the same QSO.
  • If a DXer requests a bureau card, they will be asked to confirm that they will be able to receive it, by selecting a checkbox. Stations within the USA will not be allowed to request bureau cards from each other as there is no bureau service for internal (domestic) cards.
  • If a DXer requests a bureau card, they will be reminded that while the card is free to them, it is not free of cost to the QSL manager. Before they get to the donation form in the OQRS checkout, they will be reminded that they can send a donation for their bureau cards, but will not be compelled to do so.

Lastly, as has always been the case, Club Log itself remains completely free of charge. Every cent paid through OQRS is delivered directly into the account of the QSL manager who manages the callsign.

What will happen next?

OQRS is still quite new to our hobby, and it’s an area that is evolving fast. There are still gaps in this mechanism that are difficult to automate. Some of our bureau settings make Club Log OQRS unviable for certain kinds of QSLing (or certain territories) and we regretfully accept we have excluded that group of people. On the other hand, Marios 5B4WN has been very busy innovating tools to help automate label printing (both the QSL card and the mailing labels), which have proved very popular. These are available to every Club Log user, not only expeditions. We’re doing what we can to help paper QSLing, and feel this is complementary to the importance of ARRL’s Logbook Of The World project, for example.

More changes seem likely to emerge. OQRS is extremely popular and hundreds of thousands of QSLs have been completed in Club Log this way. For now at least I think the points, above, in response to the survey are the important areas that needed addressing. Thank you to everyone who responded, as well as the chairmen of various DX clubs and DX foundations with whom these changes have been discussed in the past 3-6 months.

If you’d like to discuss the survey results, you can comment on this post.

73 – Michael G7VJR and the Club Log volunteers

8 thoughts on “Club Log OQRS Survey Results

  1. Congratulations, Michael. I fully agree with all your decisions and comments. Thank you to the whole CL team for taking the time to run the survey and analyse the results – very valuable.
    Good DX, 73 de Roger/G3SXW.

  2. $5.00 for a bureau card? Even one dollar is too much. We are talking about a bulk service. If your going to charge $1 for a bureau card then you should send it direct. If your gonna charge $5 you better include some gold leaf with that direct card. IMHO if you don’t want to provide a card for postage direct or a card via the bureau then maybe you shouldn’t be operating or at the very least be up front about before the expedition. If someone requests direct then sends one through the bureau or requests via the bureau then sends another one also via the bureau then ignore the second one. I’m sorry for the QSL managers that have to put up with this but you knew it when you went into it that it wasn’t going to be easy.

  3. As normal all the factual information well presented by Michael and I totally agree with the actions proposed. Good to see such a large number of participants in the survey. Look forward to OQRS and CL, an extremely useful tool, going from strength to strength.
    Thanks again Michael

    73 John 5B4AHK P3M G3SZG

  4. Michael, your hard work is appreciated. Thank you! I agree with your decisions.
    73,
    John W9ILY


  5. I agree with Roger, G3SXW’s comments – Tnx for the survey & results.

    In these times of Instant Gratification and Fast Food, OQRS fits into the human consumption and demand model quite nicely. I plan to move all my IOTA Expedition QSL processing to OQRS soon.

    However, there is are major concerns that need to be addressed AFTER the OQRS Send button button has been pushed. Especially in the IOTA realm, with Expeditioners and QSL Managers who do NOT send out QSLs on a timely basis…even when OQRS has been used for Direct cards. For my own IOTA credit needs, there are still 50 QSLs I need where the Expeditioners and/or their QSL Managers have been sitting on my GREEN STAMPS for Direct return of a QSL card for SIX MONTHS and no QSLs sent.

    Compared to what I remember the BURO system back in the 1950’s and 1960’s where here in W6/California we received inicoming BURO cards once a month, this part of the QSL’ing Food Chain has gone down the crapper. The W6 QSL Buro typically now only sends out cards to the individual letter sorters 3 times a year, who then forward the cards to us (we pay the postage, of course). The ARRL Outgoing QSL service only makes shipments to DX BUROs 4 times a year. My understanding is other DXCC entity BURO processings are also being scaled back.

    I’ve been running into unfortunate SK (Silent Key) situations with my own personal QSL requests, and considering the age factor of DX & IOTA Chasers, I see increased problems in getting needed cards as the SK accelerates.

    And then we have the increasing postal theft problems with snail mail in many countries, which regardless of whether Direct cards are ordered via OQRS or not, still leave us all in a much less than perfect QSL Universe.

    I’d be very interested in a Survey to ascertain the age ranges and average age of those using OQRS, and the time factors experienced by others in receiving Direct QSL returns after makin OQRS payments. Of course, Expedition QSL printing does not happen overnight, and some delays in getting these cards are understandable. But SIX MONTHS with nothing? Gimme a break.

    Tnx & 73,

    Rick – K 6 V V A * The Locust


  6. An additional note about BURO cards.

    My IOTA Expedition QSL Manager responds to BURO QSL requests received via the W6 QSL BURO usually within 48 hours, and ships them to the ARRL Outgoing QSL Service almost immediately. The problem is that since he only receives incoming BURO cards every 4 months, and the ARRL Outgoing QSL service only makes shipments every 3 months, even though he takes immediate personal action on the QSL requests, depending on the timing of the incoming receipt and the actual outgoing shipment by the ARRL, there can realistically be a built-in SIX MONTH or so delay in the process. Then add the original delays in getting incoming cards to whatever the delays are on the ultimate receiving end by the time all is said and done, the BURO system is an Albatross compared to the ‘Good Old Days’. But in these Economically Challenging times for many QSL seekers, it does still serve a purpose. It is the increasing SK factor comared to when we were all in our teenage years, 20’s or 30’s that leaves much to be desired.

    FWIW & 73,

    Rick – K 6 V V A * The Locust


  7. An additional note about BURO cards.

    My IOTA Expedition QSL Manager responds to BURO QSL requests received via the W6 QSL BURO usually within 48 hours, and ships them to the ARRL Outgoing QSL Service almost immediately. The problem is that since he only receives incoming BURO cards every 4 months, and the ARRL Outgoing QSL service only makes shipments every 3 months, even though he takes immediate personal action on the QSL requests, depending on the timing of the incoming receipt and the actual outgoing shipment by the ARRL, there can realistically be a built-in SIX MONTH or so delay in the process. Then add the original delays in getting incoming cards to whatever the delays are on the ultimate receiving end by the time all is said and done, the BURO system is an Albatross compared to the ‘Good Old Days’. But in these Economically Challenging times for many QSL seekers, it does still serve a purpose. It is the increasing SK factor compared to when we were all in our teenage years, 20’s or 30’s that leaves much to be desired.

    FWIW & 73,

    Rick – K 6 V V A * The Locust

  8. I ‘m grateful that you have taken the time to synopsize all the people that responded. But,. the fact remains that Expeditions are expensive and someone has to pick up the tab. Again, the sticker on the back of my Son’s 72 VW bus says, “Grass, Gas, or Ass, no one rides free!’